Problems with rental guarantees (you can’t ignore)
There are cons with rental guarantees. Here is what first time property investors need to know.
#1 – You may pay more for a property with a rental guarantee
Rental guarantees cost money. The developer has to pay you money. To make up for this some developers will bake that cost into the price of your property.
A rental guarantee might cost the developer $10k to deliver, so the property’s price might be $10k higher.
So properties with a rental guarantee may be sold at an inflated price.
This isn’t always the case. But the risk is that investors think they’re getting something “free”. But the guarantee can come at a cost.
#2 – You may get lumped with a bad tenant
Developers tend to have conditions with their guarantees. For instance, you might have to use a property management company they own.
This is the case with a company like Wolfbrook. If you want their rental guarantee you have to use their property management company.
So you don’t get to choose your property manager.
But the real con is that it can set the wrong incentives. Your property manager might rent to the first tenant who comes along. That way the rental guarantee doesn’t kick in, so the developer doe sn’t have to pay any money.
There is a risk the person renting your property takes the first tenant, not the best tenant.
They might take someone with bad credit history and roll the dice.
But then what happens if you have issues trying to get rid of them? Residential Tenancies Act changes makes it almost impossible to evict unruly tenants.
#3 – You might get sold a “dud” investment property
Some investors think that a rental guarantee is the market rent for a property.
In other words, they think it’s the amount of rent they’d get if there was no guarantee.
That’s not the case. Some developers use this “sleight of hand” to make you think a property is a better investment than it really is.
Earlier in 2023, Golden Homes were selling a 4-bed, 2-bath property priced at $869,500.
It promised a rental guarantee of $820 a week for 2 years. So Golden Homes marketed the property as though it had a gross yield of 4.90%.
But on closer inspection, the rental guarantee was higher than the rental appraisal.
Golden Homes supplied a rental appraisal, saying the property would rent for $650-$675.
That’s up to $170 less than the rental guarantee per week.
That means Golden Homes calculated the gross yield on an inflated level of rent.
The actual gross yield isn’t 4.9%. It’s closer to 3.8% once all the costs are considered.
This matters because the rental guarantee only lasts 2 years. But most investors will hold this property for 15+ years.
So, there’s a risk that an investor will buy this property based on misleading numbers.
Then, after 2 years, the rent falls by $155 a week.
Some developers use guarantees to make properties seem like good investments, even if they’re not.